Name: Kim Crawford
Color: White
Varietal: Sauvignon Blanc
Vintage: 2008
Country/State: New Zealand
Region: Marlborough
Price: $13
Stars: 4 (out of 5)
We had this bottle of Sauvignon Blanc from New Zealand last night with grilled mahi filets. We've had it before and really enjoy it. It's crisp, clean, and refreshing. The 2008 vintage that we had last night was not quite as bracingly acidic as I remember the 2007 being.
The Kim Crawford Sauvignon Blanc is often rated as a Top 100 value by Wine Spectator, and the 2008 was no exception. It was very good, with a nose of tropical fruits and grass. I tasted grapefruit, tropical fruit, and pear. It paired well with the fish and also was very good on its own.
The focus of this blog is to keep track of the wines we drink, which ones we like, which ones we don't, and which ones we would like to try. Occasionally, it will contain posts about my family, my life and interests, primarily music and sports.
Monday, February 22, 2010
Sunday, February 21, 2010
Chardonnay - Blind Tasting
For Valentine's Day, Krista came up with the idea to do a blind tasting of a few bottles of one type of wine. After debating between several ideas like Sirah/Shiraz, Southern Rhone reds, Petite Sirah, and others, I decided to start with Chardonnay. Not for any real reason other than the fact that Chardonnay is grown all over the world and made in many different varieties. Most of the Chardonnay we prefer is unoaked or at the most, lightly oaked.
I settled on 4 bottles - two from California, one from France, and one from Chile. Here's the line-up:
We sampled each of the wines over the course of the night with cheese, bread, and crackers...
Our notes on the 4 bottles:
#1 - the color of this wine was the most pale of any of the four; it had a nice medium body with aromas and flavors of apples, pears, and citrus...tart...fruit forward, very tasty
#2 - also pale, clear...very limited nose, but extremely nice in the mouth...lemony, very smooth with a very long finish
#3 - similar to #1 in aroma and taste...green apple flavors, tart...refreshing acidity...a little lighter bodied than #1
#4 - sort of like a combination of #2 and #3...lemons, citrus, more on the nose than #2...stronger acidity and a little grassy
_________________________________________________________________
Krista and I both enjoyed all 4 wines very much. There were no clunkers in the bunch. However, we both agreed that #2 stood out as our favorite, followed closely by #1.
It turns out that the winner was the French Chardonnay, Michel Dutour "La Roche" Pouilly-Fuisse. The runner-up was the wine from Chile made by Cono Sur. There was a slight drop-off after these two, meaning that the two Chardonnays from California were our 3rd and 4th favorites from the group.
We had a lot of fun with our little blind tasting and can't wait to do it again with a different batch of wines!!
I settled on 4 bottles - two from California, one from France, and one from Chile. Here's the line-up:
- Four Vines Naked Chardonnay, (California, Santa Barbara County), 2008, $13
- Michel Dutour "La Roche" Pouilly-Fuisse, (France, Pouilly-Fuisse), 2006, $16
- Cono Sur Chardonnay, (Chile, Central Valley), 2009, $9
- Kunde Estate Chardonnay, (California, Sonoma), 2006, $12
We sampled each of the wines over the course of the night with cheese, bread, and crackers...
Our notes on the 4 bottles:
#1 - the color of this wine was the most pale of any of the four; it had a nice medium body with aromas and flavors of apples, pears, and citrus...tart...fruit forward, very tasty
#2 - also pale, clear...very limited nose, but extremely nice in the mouth...lemony, very smooth with a very long finish
#3 - similar to #1 in aroma and taste...green apple flavors, tart...refreshing acidity...a little lighter bodied than #1
#4 - sort of like a combination of #2 and #3...lemons, citrus, more on the nose than #2...stronger acidity and a little grassy
_________________________________________________________________
Krista and I both enjoyed all 4 wines very much. There were no clunkers in the bunch. However, we both agreed that #2 stood out as our favorite, followed closely by #1.
It turns out that the winner was the French Chardonnay, Michel Dutour "La Roche" Pouilly-Fuisse. The runner-up was the wine from Chile made by Cono Sur. There was a slight drop-off after these two, meaning that the two Chardonnays from California were our 3rd and 4th favorites from the group.
We had a lot of fun with our little blind tasting and can't wait to do it again with a different batch of wines!!
Labels:
Blind Tasting,
California,
Chardonnay,
Chile,
France,
Pouilly-Fuisse,
White,
Wine
Saturday, February 13, 2010
Columbia Crest Grand Estates Merlot
Name: Columbia Crest Grand Estates Merlot
Color: Red
Varietal: Merlot
Vintage: 2006
Country/State: Washington
Region: Columbia Valley
Price: $8
Stars: 4 (out of 5)
The Columbia Crest Grand Estates line of wines is often mentioned as a great source for value. Their Merlot, in particular, consistently receives great press. The nose is dominated by blueberry and chocolate. The taste is mostly dark berry, cherry, and cocoa. It has a medium body and a lingering finish. The chocolate notes were really nice. We had this wine last night with pizza and finished the bottle after dinner. It went well with the food and on its own.
The 2006 version is 85% Merlot, with Syrah, Cab Franc, and Cabernet Sauvignon providing the remaining 15%. I can't remember the last time we drank Merlot, but this one was very impressive.
Color: Red
Varietal: Merlot
Vintage: 2006
Country/State: Washington
Region: Columbia Valley
Price: $8
Stars: 4 (out of 5)
The Columbia Crest Grand Estates line of wines is often mentioned as a great source for value. Their Merlot, in particular, consistently receives great press. The nose is dominated by blueberry and chocolate. The taste is mostly dark berry, cherry, and cocoa. It has a medium body and a lingering finish. The chocolate notes were really nice. We had this wine last night with pizza and finished the bottle after dinner. It went well with the food and on its own.
The 2006 version is 85% Merlot, with Syrah, Cab Franc, and Cabernet Sauvignon providing the remaining 15%. I can't remember the last time we drank Merlot, but this one was very impressive.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
King Estate Signature Collection Pinot Gris
Name: King Estate Pinot Gris
Color: White
Varietal: Pinot Gris
Vintage: 2008
Country/State: Oregon
Region: Willamette Valley
Price: $14
Stars: 4.5 (out of 5)
The King Estate Pinot Gris is often mentioned as a great value, as well as an excellent representation of Oregon's success with Pinot Gris. Recently, it was named the St. Pete Times Wine of the Week, was recommended by the New York Times wine columnist, and was named to Wine Spectator's Top 100 wines of 2009. Is it worth all the hype? I would say so.
We had this wine last night with Chinese take-out (sesame chicken and pork fried rice), after watching Kentucky thoroughly dominate the over-matched LSU Tigers. Another strong effort by the Beast, DeMarcus "Boogie" Cousins and the boys. Patterson was really active today and had a great game, too.
Krista and I both enjoyed the wine and quickly finished the bottle that night. The wine had a nice medium body feel in the mouth, with good weight and rather zippy acidity. The nose was dominated by pear, peach, and citrus fruits. The taste was similar to the aroma, along with some nice minerality. It's a fresh and fruity wine that goes well with many different dishes.
Color: White
Varietal: Pinot Gris
Vintage: 2008
Country/State: Oregon
Region: Willamette Valley
Price: $14
Stars: 4.5 (out of 5)
The King Estate Pinot Gris is often mentioned as a great value, as well as an excellent representation of Oregon's success with Pinot Gris. Recently, it was named the St. Pete Times Wine of the Week, was recommended by the New York Times wine columnist, and was named to Wine Spectator's Top 100 wines of 2009. Is it worth all the hype? I would say so.
We had this wine last night with Chinese take-out (sesame chicken and pork fried rice), after watching Kentucky thoroughly dominate the over-matched LSU Tigers. Another strong effort by the Beast, DeMarcus "Boogie" Cousins and the boys. Patterson was really active today and had a great game, too.
Krista and I both enjoyed the wine and quickly finished the bottle that night. The wine had a nice medium body feel in the mouth, with good weight and rather zippy acidity. The nose was dominated by pear, peach, and citrus fruits. The taste was similar to the aroma, along with some nice minerality. It's a fresh and fruity wine that goes well with many different dishes.
Monday, February 1, 2010
D'Autrefois Vin de Pays Pinot Noir
Name: D'Autrefois Vin de Pays Pinot Noir
Color: Red
Varietal: Pinot Noir
Vintage: 2008
Country/State: France
Region: Languedoc Roussillon
Price: $10
Stars: 3.5 (out of 5)
This is the best selling Pinot Noir at Total Wine, but it really wasn't anything special to me. It had a light body, with aromas and taste of strawberry and other soft red fruits. It improved with some time in the glass, but never really developed into anything more than "OK". Several months ago, we had the "Reserve" version of the D'Autrefois Pinot. This "regular" bottling was very similar to the Reserve, but without some of the earthiness of the Reserve. I would probably pass on both of these wines in the future.
Color: Red
Varietal: Pinot Noir
Vintage: 2008
Country/State: France
Region: Languedoc Roussillon
Price: $10
Stars: 3.5 (out of 5)
This is the best selling Pinot Noir at Total Wine, but it really wasn't anything special to me. It had a light body, with aromas and taste of strawberry and other soft red fruits. It improved with some time in the glass, but never really developed into anything more than "OK". Several months ago, we had the "Reserve" version of the D'Autrefois Pinot. This "regular" bottling was very similar to the Reserve, but without some of the earthiness of the Reserve. I would probably pass on both of these wines in the future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)